2006-02-09                     Senate Journal                      Page 2125
SB 54                                                                                             
Senator French requested that the reconsideration on CS FOR                                         
SENATE BILL NO. 54(FIN) be taken up. The bill was before the                                        
Senate on reconsideration.                                                                          
                                                                                                    
The question to be reconsidered: "Shall CS FOR SENATE BILL NO.                                      
54(FIN) "An Act amending protective order statutes for crimes                                       
involving stalking to include crimes involving sexual assault and                                   
sexual abuse, to provide for other relief ordered by a court, to add the                            
protective orders to a centralized registry, to prevent denial solely for a                         
lapse of time, and to require notification of the court of known civil or                           
criminal actions involving the petitioner or respondent; relating to                                
notifications to victims of sexual assault and to mandatory arrest for                              
crimes involving violation of protective orders and violation of                                    
conditions of release; and amending Rule 65, Alaska Rules of Civil                                  
Procedure" pass the Senate?" The roll was taken with the following                                  
result:                                                                                             
                                                                                                    
CSSB 54(FIN)                                                                                        
Third Reading - On Reconsideration                                                                  
Court Rule                                                                                          
                                                                                                    
YEAS:  20   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  0                                                   
                                                                                                    
Yeas:  Bunde, Cowdery, Davis, Dyson, Ellis, Elton, French, Green,                                   
Guess, Hoffman, Huggins, Kookesh, Olson, Seekins, Stedman,                                          
Stevens B, Stevens G, Therriault, Wagoner, Wilken                                                   
                                                                                                    
and so, CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 54(FIN) passed the Senate on                                         
reconsideration.                                                                                    
                                                                                                    
Senator Gary Stevens moved and asked unanimous consent that the                                     
vote on the passage of the bill be considered the vote on the Court                                 
Rule change. Without objection, it was so ordered and the bill was                                  
referred to the Secretary for engrossment.